OUR DELIVERY MODEL
Continuum organizes readiness work around four functions. Ivan leads the engagement. Your proposal identifies the deliverables, responsibilities, review points, and any separately arranged support before work begins.
FUNCTIONS, RESPONSIBILITIES, AND HANDOFFS
These are delivery functions, not a representation of four staffed positions. Contributors and providers are identified and confirmed in the agreed scope.
One accountable point of contact.
Ivan leads the client relationship, defines the scope, coordinates deliverables, communicates risks, and tracks decisions and next steps. Responsibilities, review points, and communication expectations are agreed before work begins.
Specialist judgment, scoped where needed.
Where an engagement requires additional CMMC expertise, the proposal identifies the review responsibilities and required qualifications. Any additional reviewer is confirmed before the relevant work begins; specialist involvement is not assumed in every engagement.
Working materials tied to your environment.
Assessment findings, SSP and policy updates, evidence inventories, and remediation tracking are assigned within the scope. This work may be founder-led or performed by a confirmed practitioner, with clear responsibilities for client input and review.
Technical work with clear ownership.
Configuration changes, engineering, vulnerability scanning, and other technical remediation are performed by your internal team or a separately scoped provider. Technical responsibilities, dependencies, and supporting evidence are agreed in advance.
Continuum coordinates compliance assessments, documentation, evidence, and readiness activities. Technical implementation and official assessment fees are separately scoped where applicable. Official CMMC certification assessments must be performed by appropriately authorized or accredited assessment organizations.
CMMC PRACTICE DEVELOPMENT
Continuum is developing standardized working materials and review practices to support traceable readiness work. Each engagement is tailored to the contractor’s systems, applicable requirements, and current implementation.
Consistent ways to record the applicable requirement, implementation, evidence, gaps, and open questions.
Guidance for connecting SSP statements and procedures to actual systems, responsibilities, and security practices.
Indexes that identify the relevant environment, artifact reference, owner, review date, and validation notes.
Action plans with accountable owners, priorities, dependencies, closure criteria, and supporting evidence.
Checks for consistency, traceability, completeness, and unresolved questions before work is finalized.
A template provides structure. Your environment determines the content. Published samples are illustrative starting points; engagement deliverables require environment-specific information, evidence review, and resolution of open questions.
Discuss your requirements, current challenges, and the support your organization needs. An introductory consultation helps identify suitable next steps; it is not a complete assessment.